Ask Dr. Z

Ask Dr. Z Knowledge Base houses over 7,500 coding questions and answers dating back to 2013.

Ask Dr. Z Disclaimer

Please note this question was answered in 2017. The coding advice may or may not be outdated.

Brachiocephalic AV Fistulogram with ligation of venous tributary

Date: May 10, 2017

Question:

Does ligation of a flow-stealing venous tributary via cutdown count as 36909 or open revision 36832? "History: Non-maturing brachiocephalic AVF. Procedure: Angiography of right brachiocephalic fistula reveals 90% stenosis from proximal aspect of fistula, approximately 1 cm distal to the anastomosis. Lesion was ballooned with 4, 5, and 6 mm balloons. Completion angio reveals less than 10% residual stenosis (36902). There was also noted at this time a venous tributary in the mid upper arm that was stealing a significant portion of flow through the fistula. A small transverse mid upper arm incision is made, and the venous tributaries were identified and ligated. Completion angio reveals excellent improved flow with no residual stenosis at the proximal anastomosis and no further flow through the ligated tributary."

Sign up for a membership to view the answer to this question.

Need to ask Dr.Z?

Don't see the answer you're looking for in the knowledge base? No problem. You can ask Dr. Z directly!
Ask Dr. Z a question now!