Ask Dr. Z

Ask Dr. Z Knowledge Base houses over 7,500 coding questions and answers dating back to 2013.

Ask Dr. Z Disclaimer

Please note this question was answered in 2014. The coding advice may or may not be outdated.

Single Chamber Pacemaker Upgrade to Dual Chamber

Date: Aug 7, 2014

Question:

"Patient came in for elective subcutaneous pacemaker generator change. This was performed and seemed successful. But, prior to extubation, pacemaker lost capture. It was decided to replace the whole system. Patient was re-prepped and draped. A sternotomy was performed. Bipolar epicardial lead placement, with suboptimal parameters; a unipolar screw-in lead was then placed in the right ventricle at base of heart. Process was repeated, with same leads then placed in the right atrium free wall. Unipolar leads showed good threshold. The pacemaker pocket had been opened and subcutaneous pacemaker removed. All four new leads were tunneled to the pocket. Pocket was revised to hold new hardware. Bipolar leads were capped; original V-lead was also capped. New unipolar leads were connected to new dual chamber pacemaker." I know I need to report code 33202 for the epicardial lead placement. My dilemma is that the CPT Codebook says to use code 33202 with 33213 for pacemaker insertion with existing dual leads, but isn't code 33213 for when a previous generator is not being removed during same session? Would it be appropriate to bill either codes 33202/33228 or 33202/33214 for this scenario?

Sign up for a membership to view the answer to this question.

Need to ask Dr.Z?

Don't see the answer you're looking for in the knowledge base? No problem. You can ask Dr. Z directly!
Ask Dr. Z a question now!