Ask Dr. Z

Ask Dr. Z Knowledge Base houses over 7,500 coding questions and answers dating back to 2013.

Ask Dr. Z Disclaimer

Please note this question was answered in 2021. The coding advice may or may not be outdated.

Charging 75710-52 for evaluating vessel access.

Date: Apr 30, 2021

Question:

I have an MD who is questioning whether we can charge a limited extremity angio to evaluate for patency in the vessel after access to evaluate for dissection or pseudoaneurysm caused by the access. It is also used to evaluate for closure device. I realize that imaging done to evaluate if the vessel is appropriate for the closure device is included, but am wondering if this encompasses more. Below is a typical note in the rad report.

"A limited right common femoral angiogram was performed to evaluate the vessel diameter and puncture site. This demonstrated normal anatomy without evidence for vessel injury or spasm. Good flow was seen in the common femoral and superficial femoral arteries. The introducer sheath was removed, and hemostasis was achieved with Angio-Seal."

Sign up for a membership to view the answer to this question.

Need to ask Dr.Z?

Don't see the answer you're looking for in the knowledge base? No problem. You can ask Dr. Z directly!
Ask Dr. Z a question now!