Please Join Us in Nashville at

the Gaylord Opryland

Resort & Convention Center

Sept 12-15

for our next

Interventional Radiology & Cardiology

Coding Seminar


Do you have your 2006 Edition yet?




 

Here is your ZHealth Coding Newsletter for July 2006

Coding Question: 

This physician performed angioplasty and stent placement involving a right femoral popliteal vein bypass graft.  Is it correct to code one open stent placement (37207,75960) and two angioplasties (35456,35459,75962,and 75964) for the procedure described herein?  Are 36247 and 36248 the correct catheterization codes?  The puncture of the graft and distal anastomosis is confusing me.

Incision was made over the previous vein graft and the vein graft was exposed.  It was punctured with a 4 French Micropuncture needle and I then exchanged this for a 6 French sheath.  We then did an injection which showed a patent vein graft.  There was a tight calcified distal anastomotic stenosis calcification in the popliteal artery with a 90% stenosis and a tibioperoneal trunk stenosis which was very tight, about 90%.  I was able to traverse these with a Miracle Brothers 3 wire.  We then used a 3x6 mm cutting balloon to angioplasty these three sites.  There was improved angiographic appearance but I still was not satisfied with it.  We then exchanged catheters.  We attempted to get a wire down a posterior tibial which would have given a pulse in the foot and an anterior tibial, but we were unable to transverse these.  There was pretty extensive collateral runoff and the graft was patent so therefore it was elected to treat the immediate distal outflow problems.  We exchanged for a 4x2 mm balloon and angioplastied the distal anastomosis, the right distal popliteal lesion and the right tibioperoneal trunk lesion.  I was satisfied with the appearance of the distal two lesions but there was a slight dissection at the anastomosis in the popliteal just distal to the suture line.  There was no proximal runoff.  Another inflation was tried for about 2 minutes but was still not satisfied so we deployed two 6x22 mm wall stents across this region and then dilated the wall stent with a 4 mm balloon.  There was a much improved angiographic appearance.  We then removed the stent and closed the vein with 5-0 Prolene sutures..

Dr. Z's Answer:

I would consider the proximal and distal anastamosis of the graft and the entire graft in-between to be one vessel for coding purposes.  The native distal popliteal artery stenosis appears to be distinct and separate and should be allowed as a separate vessel to code.  I am uncertain as to the exact location of the tibio-peroneal trunk lesion. If it were immediately adjacent to the distal popliteal, I might consider it part of a bridging lesion and not additionally code.  If it were mid to distal, separate and distinct, then I would code for this lesion as well.  The MD states he got a good result with the two distal lesions but the proximal lesion he was not satisfied with.  Unfortunately, most local policies require documentation of 30% or greater residual stenosis, 5mm or greater residual gradient, a flow-limiting dissection or an acute occlusion be documented to meet medical necessity for billing both an angioplasty and a stent.  In this case he only states he wasn't satisfied because of a "slight dissection".  This doesn't meet criteria to bill both so I would code as you have, with two open angioplasties and one open stent. The catheter placement code in this case would be coded based on the graft as the non-selective 36140, the popliteal as a first order and the furthest you got, and the tibio-peroneal trunk as a second order vessel. Due to bundling, I would code 36246 only for the catheter placement as that is the furthest that a catheter is documented.

The coding question above was recently submitted by a member of ZHealth Online, and the Q & A was posted in our Members section. There are now over 600 searchable Q & A's in the Dr. Z Forum database. Plus, as a member you can access our Case-of-the-Month, ask your own coding questions, receive our biweekly ZHealth Online newsletters (not the same as this newsletter), get 10% discounts on all ZHealth Publishing conferences and publications, and much more. Try ZHealth Online free for a week (note that only paying members can ask coding questions).

2006 ZHealth Coding Conferences 

We hope that you can join us at one of the two remaining ZHealth Publishing interventional radiology and cardiology coding conferences in 2006:

 

Sept 12-15 at the Gaylord Opryland in Nashville, TN

 

Nov 7-10 at the Wynn Las Vegas, in Las Vegas, NV

 

Read what attendees had to say about our most recent conference. All ZHealth Online members receive a 10% discount off your registration.